BANGER

Banger vs Composer

Composer is A no-code platform for building and automating systematic equities and ETF strategies ("symphonies"), operated as a registered broker-dealer. Banger is a strategy-automation runtime for prediction markets. Here is how they compare, and when each one is the right call.

BangerComposer
Primary assetsPrediction markets (Polymarket, Kalshi); equities and crypto as expansion adaptersUS equities and ETFs
Prediction marketsNative. The wedge, not an afterthought.None. As a regulated US broker-dealer it cannot host Polymarket or Kalshi flows.
Strategy authoringReal Python (banger.Strategy) or clone a marketplace strategy and configure itVisual, no-code symphony builder
CustodyNever. You bring your own venue keys.Custodial. Composer is your broker and holds the account.

Where Banger is different

When Composer is the better choice

Hands-off investors who want to automate diversified ETF and equity strategies without writing code, inside a single regulated brokerage account.

The verdict

If you want automated ETF investing in a regulated brokerage, Composer is excellent. If you want to run strategies on prediction markets with your own keys and your own code, Composer can't get there and Banger is built for exactly that.

FAQ

Can you trade Polymarket or Kalshi on Composer?
No. Composer is a registered US broker-dealer focused on equities and ETFs, and does not support prediction markets like Polymarket or Kalshi. Banger is built specifically for those venues.
Is Banger a good Composer alternative?
For prediction markets, yes. Banger automates strategies on Polymarket and Kalshi, lets you write real Python or clone a strategy, paper-trades against live market data first, and never holds your funds. Composer remains the stronger choice if your goal is automated equity and ETF investing.

Run your first strategy on prediction markets

Paper-trade against the live Polymarket and Kalshi book in minutes. Free, with your own keys.

Start free